Water Archives - Shareable https://www.shareable.net/category/water/ Share More. Live Better. Thu, 29 May 2025 15:47:54 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://www.shareable.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/cropped-Shareable-Favicon-February-25-2025-32x32.png Water Archives - Shareable https://www.shareable.net/category/water/ 32 32 212507828 Indigenous disaster response: The fight against a mining giant in Brazil with Allen Myers https://www.shareable.net/response/indigenous-disaster-response-the-fight-against-a-mining-giant-in-brazil-with-allen-myers/ Thu, 21 Nov 2024 18:11:24 +0000 https://www.shareable.net/?post_type=podcast&p=51067 In this episode of The Response, we explore a devastating and ongoing story of environmental disaster, Indigenous resistance, and corporate exploitation in Brazil. This powerful installment brings listeners face-to-face with the catastrophic failures of Vale, a multinational mining corporation, and the resilient efforts of the Kamakã Mongoió people to protect their sacred land and water.

The post Indigenous disaster response: The fight against a mining giant in Brazil with Allen Myers appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
In this episode of The Response, we explore a devastating and ongoing story of environmental disaster, Indigenous resistance, and corporate exploitation in Brazil. This powerful installment brings listeners face-to-face with the catastrophic failures of Vale, a multinational mining corporation, and the resilient efforts of the Kamakã Mongoió people to protect their sacred land and water.

The episode features a compelling conversation with journalist, filmmaker, and community organizer Allen Myers, whose recent article for Shareable, Modern Day Colonialism and the Disastrous Fate of an Indigenous Water and Land Protector, offers a chilling look at the ongoing struggles in the region. Myers shares insights from his 2022 trip to Brumadinho, Brazil, where he witnessed the enduring scars left by a 2019 dam collapse and the fight for justice that followed.

In January 2019, a toxic dam operated by Vale in the State of Minas Gerais failed catastrophically, releasing 12 million cubic meters of sludge into the surrounding environment. The disaster claimed 272 lives and decimated the livelihoods of countless others. This was not an isolated incident—just four years earlier, the Mariana dam collapse, also operated by Vale, caused Brazil’s worst environmental catastrophe. Despite warnings and inspections highlighting structural vulnerabilities, Vale failed to act, prioritizing profits over safety.

For the Indigenous Kamakã Mongoió, the collapse was not just a distant tragedy but a direct assault on their way of life. Chief Merong, a prominent leader of the tribe, emerged as a steadfast protector of his community’s land and water, standing against the encroachments of Vale. He and other Kamakã Mongoió have faced threats, harassment, violence, and even death for their resistance, a chilling manifestation of what Myers calls “modern-day colonialism.”

While the subject matter of this episode of The Response is tragic, it’s also a call to action. Myers draws parallels between the disasters in Brazil and the 2018 Camp Fire in Paradise, California, highlighting the universal dangers of corporate negligence and environmental exploitation. Both of these stories serve as stark reminders that disasters exacerbated by greed are not inevitable but preventable.

 

Editor’s note: Allen’s trip to Brazil was captured on film. The original project included producing a sequel to our award-winning documentary, “The Response: How Puerto Ricans are Restoring Power to the People,” but we have had to put it on the back burner for some time due to a lack of funding. Please contact theresponse@shareable.net if you would like to support bringing this story to the screen.

Resources:

Indigenous Disaster Response episode credits:

Follow The Response on Twitter and Instagram for updates, memes, and more. Our entire catalog of documentaries and interviews can be found at theresponsepodcast.org — or wherever you get your podcasts.

The Response is an award-winning podcast series produced by Shareable exploring how communities respond to disaster — from hurricanes to wildfires to reactionary politics and more.

Want to help spread the word? Please rate and review us on Apple Podcasts and Spotify — it makes a huge difference in reaching new people who may otherwise not hear about this show.

Available anywhere you get your podcasts, including:

Image result for apple podcast
Image result for spotify

The post Indigenous disaster response: The fight against a mining giant in Brazil with Allen Myers appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
51067
Modern-day colonialism and the tragic fate of an indigenous water and land protector https://www.shareable.net/modern-day-colonialism-and-the-tragic-fate-of-an-indigenous-water-and-land-protector/ https://www.shareable.net/modern-day-colonialism-and-the-tragic-fate-of-an-indigenous-water-and-land-protector/#respond Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:37:49 +0000 https://www.shareable.net/?p=51064 Chief Merong’s fight against ecocide ends in tragedy In the heart of Brazil, in the state of Minas Gerais, the lush green canopy veils both the stunning beauty of nature and the shadowy depths of exploitation. Here, an age-old conflict persists between those committed to protecting the land and water and those who profit from

The post Modern-day colonialism and the tragic fate of an indigenous water and land protector appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
Chief Merong’s fight against ecocide ends in tragedy

In the heart of Brazil, in the state of Minas Gerais, the lush green canopy veils both the stunning beauty of nature and the shadowy depths of exploitation. Here, an age-old conflict persists between those committed to protecting the land and water and those who profit from its destruction.

Chief Merong, a respected leader of the Kamakã Mongoió tribe, stood steadfast as a guardian of his territory against the encroachments of Vale, a multinational mining corporation notorious for its environmental destruction. Vale’s relentless pursuit of profit clashed with Chief Merong’s commitment to safeguarding the sacred springs and forests that sustained his people.

Talles, my interpreter and local fixer, and I journeyed into the verdant hills and dense foliage that surrounded Brumadinho. Along the border of fenced-off land claimed by the mining giant Vale, I encountered a stark juxtaposition: guarded and private land stripped of its life to bare red soil alongside open, teeming canopies of flourishing jungle.

We followed a narrow and winding road as instructed by our contact until it ended abruptly into a wall of vines and trees, an impassable berm. We parked, and there, peering through the green shadows, spear in hand and a small headdress, was our guide to the village. As we walked, he pointed out edible and medicinal plants and shared with excitement about the wild boar they hunt and the fish from the pools of fresh water they harvest. It was as if he was introducing us to members of his family. It was clear: this land was a part of him.

The path began to ascend. At the top of the hill, we could look west across a small ravine and see the scars left by Vale: barren land, naked red soil, and the ominous distant roar of lifeless machines with an endless appetite. From where we stood, paths continued in different directions, a patch of land open to the sky where rows of seedlings sprouted among taller coffee and corn plants. We had arrived at the Kamakã Mongoió Village, a humble bastion of resilience amidst the encroaching threat of exploitation. A simple banner reading “Territory of the Kamakã Mongoió” marked the border of the tribe’s claimed land. There waiting for us was Chief Merong.

A banner signifying the entrance to tribal land
Photo Credit: Allen Myers

Legacy of ecocide

Vale’s history in Brazil is marked by catastrophic failures and enduring environmental destruction. In 2015, the Vale-operated Mariana Dam collapsed, unleashing 60 million cubic meters of iron ore waste, creating a toxic mudflow that devastated communities, killed 19 people, and polluted the Doce River, affecting hundreds of thousands of residents. This disaster was not only the worst environmental catastrophe in Brazil’s history but also a stark warning of the risks associated with lax safety standards in large-scale mining operations. Just last week, a Brazilian court did not find Vale and mining giant BHP “legally” responsible for the damn collapse. Despite the ruling, over 620,000 complainants, including many Indigenous communities, continue to seek over $45 billion in damages from Vale.

Despite this avoidable tragic event, necessary reforms and safety measures remained unimplemented. Just four years later, in 2019, history repeated itself when the Brumadinho Dam, also operated by Vale, catastrophically failed. Ignoring prior warnings and expert reports of imminent risk, the dam’s collapse released 12 million cubic meters of toxic tailings, which swept through the area’s infrastructure, including a busy cafeteria and several villages, and claimed 272 lives. The surrounding community of Brumadinho was devastated by the loss of life, environmental destruction, and erosion of trust with the region’s largest employer.

As we recount the devastations wrought by Vale, it’s crucial to recognize the demand driving such destruction. The iron ore extracted from these mines, a cornerstone for the steel used in buildings and vehicles across the developed world, ties global consumers directly to the ecocide in Brazil. Each ton of steel in our cities’ skylines to the appliances in our kitchens starts with ore mined at great environmental and human cost—facilitated by a global market system that prizes low costs over ecological or social impacts.

"Indigenous disaster response: The fight against a mining giant in Brazil with Allen Myers" book cover

Listen: “Indigenous disaster response: The fight against a mining giant in Brazil with Allen Myers”

In Brumadinho, the relationship between the residents and Vale is fraught with contradictions. On one hand, Vale is seen as a benefactor that has brought economic prosperity to the region. Jobs provided by Vale are often well-paying compared to local alternatives, bringing a level of economic stability previously unattainable for many families. Schools, healthcare, and infrastructure have all seen improvements directly or indirectly due to the presence of mining operations.

However, this financial dependency is a double-edged sword. The economic benefits come with a high cost. The environmental degradation caused by Vale’s activities has not only scarred the landscape but also undermined the community’s long-term sustainability. Fishing and agriculture, once staples of local subsistence, are now compromised by pollution and land use changes.

Interviews with local residents reveal a spectrum of emotions—from gratitude for the economic opportunities Vale provides to a profound sense of loss and betrayal after the dam disaster. Geraldo Oliveira Silva, a resident of Brumadinho and employee of Vale lost his brother in the 2019 dam collapse. He expressed his dilemma this way: “What are we to do? We need jobs and yet, these jobs could cost us our lives.”

While many in Brumadinho feel economically tied to Vale, they live under the shadow of a grim statistic: according to data from Global Witness, Brazil is the second deadliest country in the world for environmental and land protectors, with hundreds killed over recent years. This underscores the high stakes of any opposition to the mining giant.

The sentiment of being trapped in an “abusive relationship” with Vale is echoed throughout the community. Many express anger and frustration over the disasters, recognizing the preventable nature of these tragedies if Vale had prioritized safety and environmental concerns over profits. Yet, the fear of losing their primary source of income keeps many from voicing their concerns too loudly.

Community division on the issue strains the social fabric. Talles shared, “Many people have been paid lots of money for the disaster, they feel grateful to the company, while others have received nothing. There is inequality in the community based on how close you are with the mining companies.”

The story of Brumadinho is a microcosm of a global issue where local communities are caught in the web of corporate influence and malpractice, dependent on the very forces that threaten their way of life and environment. The tragic irony is not lost on the residents, who continue to grapple with their realities, hoping for change yet wary of the consequences.

For the Kamakã Mongoió, who are not employed by Vale, who live simply on land claimed by the company, Vale’s role in the story is much more straightforward: They are a villain, unceremoniously exploiting land and water for profit, land and water they hold to be sacred, the dam collapse in their eyes is an unsurprising continuation of disastrous behavior.

A monument to the people who were killed by the damn collapse
Photo Credit: Allen Myers

Learning from disaster: A personal connection

As I embarked on my journey to Brazil, my initial intent was to glean insights from communities grappling with the aftermath of catastrophe. I’m from Paradise, California, a community intimate with major disasters. The 2018 Camp Fire reduced the mountain town of 28,000 to rubble and ashes in a single day. The inferno claimed 85 lives and laid waste to 14,000 homes, including my parents’ home.

Like the tragedy unfolding in Brazil, our own disaster bore the fingerprints of corporate greed. Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), entrusted with maintaining our vital electric infrastructure, had long ignored the warning signs of impending danger.

On November 8th, 2018, as unrelenting winds, accelerated by the effects of the man-made climate crisis, swept through our parched landscape. An outdated transmission line broke free, sending a shower of sparks into the tinder-dry brush below. These sparks fanned by unseasonably high winds whipped up a wildfire of unprecedented magnitude. By year’s end, the Camp Fire stood as the most costly disaster in the world in 2018, another grim testament to the perils of corporate negligence, climate change, and poor forest management.

Exploring Post-Disaster Recovery: A Journey to Brumadinho, Brazil

Armed with a keen sense of inquiry and a commitment to understanding the intricate dynamics of post-disaster recovery, I embarked on a journey to Brumadinho, Brazil. There, amidst the wreckage left by the dam collapse, I sought to unravel the complexities of community resilience and response to disaster in a cultural context.

I connected with survivors, dedicated search and rescue workers, community organizers, and journalists who tirelessly chronicled the aftermath. While much of the focus was understandably on immediate relief efforts and survivor support, I was compelled to delve deeper, probing into the vital work of prevention and regeneration. This led me to the Kamakã Mongoió tribe.

The Kamakã Mongoiós are a family of the Pataxó-hã-hã-hãe people, whose mother village is located on the southern coast of Bahia state, Brazil. Chief Merong, as prompted by spirits in the dream world, relocated to Menias Gerisis with a mission to heal the land from the destruction of Vale. “I was called by the Earth to be here,” he shared with me.

Chief Merong at the tribe's spring
Photo Credit: Allen Myers

Indigenous wisdom

We settled into the Kamakã Mongoiós’ communal gathering space, a maloca made from logs from the forest and thatch from its fronds. Chief Merong greeted us and broke into song and dance with members of his tribe; they moved in unison, weaving a rich tapestry of harmonious sound in a circular dance. What transpired before me was far more than merely settling in for an interview, it was a revered and vital ritual for welcoming outsiders and commencing a conversation. It felt, for lack of a better word, holy.

I posed questions that weighed heavy on my mind: How can communities organize after disaster to address the underlying conditions that led to catastrophe? How can they rebuild in a manner that meets the diverse needs and aspirations of all members? And, crucially, how can future disasters be mitigated through informed decision-making and collective action?

Chief Merong, a young man of 35, wore an exquisite headdress of Macaw feathers. Adidas flip-flops protected his feet, and tattered board shorts hung from his hips. His resolute gaze matched the clarity and directness of his words. “Our connection to this land and water is not merely about survival—it’s a profound relationship with all beings,” he explained. “Being good stewards of this earth is an ancestral duty, deeply ingrained in our way of life. The examples of destruction we see are because they are hurting the Earth. This is just the Earth reacting, balancing. The company [Vale] does not care about the Earth. We are here to defend the land and water.”

The land settled by the Kamakã Mongoió was in contention: Vale believed the land was theirs to expand their iron ore extraction. The Kamakã Mongoió believed their duty was to restore and protect the land and water. Courts sided with Vale, but the Kamakã Mongoió remained on the land. The stage was set for conflict.

Chief Merong recounted chilling encounters with modern threats: unidentified men appearing without notice that issued stark ultimatums to vacate their land, drones that buzzed overhead as symbols of surveillance and intimidation. “These aren’t just intrusions; they’re direct assaults on our sovereignty and well-being,” Merong stated. The cold mechanical whirring of drones— celebrated technologies in the global north—became harbingers of fear in the otherwise tranquil village.

After some time in conversation, with children playing nearby and chickens pecking at some sweet morsel, Merong wanted to show us the sacred spring and offer another song. We walked past simple structures made of local materials. Coffee, taro, and other edible plants lined the path to a modest pool of water shaded by the thick canopy of the jungle. There, Chief Merong and other tribal members recited another song. There was reciprocity in all of his interactions with the environment; the water wasn’t merely there for his taking but something to be worshiped.

Chief Merong
Photo Credit: Allen Myers

Tragedy strikes

On March 4, 2024, I received a text from Talles notifying me that the Chief was found lifeless and hung from a tree. As the days unfolded, news reports emerged that cast his death in stark terms: murder. His death sent shockwaves not only through the Indigenous community but the residents of Brumadinho, who all the more starkly felt the internal conflict of loyalty to a company that provides them with jobs and victimization by a corporate power that values profit over life.

According to data from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) published on Tuesday, March 5th (a day after Chief Merong was found dead), at least 126 human rights and environmental defenders were murdered in Latin America in 2023. That’s a murder every 3 days in Latin America alone. Chief Merong’s death fits into a larger, menacing trend. According to Global Witness, five percent of the world’s population are Indigenous peoples, yet they make up 40 percent of the murdered land and water defenders. They are the frontline communities seeking to protect that which we all depend upon and yet are at the greatest risk for reprisal.

Despite knowing his life was under constant threat, Chief Merong bravely stood his ground and ultimately sacrificed his life for the sacred lands he cherished.

Colonialism is alive and well. It operates as it has for hundreds of years by exploiting and extracting resources to the benefit of the few. It hides behind the innovation of “free markets,” presenting an incomplete story devoid of cause and effect. In the global north, we are encouraged to seek personal opportunity and indulge without limitations. We reap the benefits of environmental exploitation and are shielded from the consequences of our appetite for consumption.

As we mourn the loss of Chief Merong, we are compelled to confront the stark realities of our world—a world where Indigenous voices are silenced, where the pursuit of profit can trump even the sanctity of human life, and where the legacy of colonialism continues to build systems of exploitation in the present. In honoring Chief Merong’s memory, we must redouble our efforts to dismantle the structures of oppression that continue to plague our world.

Yet amidst our resolve, a troubling reality looms large: the pervasive influence of the very systems we seek to dismantle. Indeed, we find ourselves entangled within a web of exploitation as both victims and unwitting accomplices. It is only through collective awareness and concerted action that we can hope to break free from the grip of the “company” and forge a future rooted in justice and equity, where we are all water and land protectors.

Editor’s note: Allen’s interviews on this trip were captured on film with the help of a local fixer who also served as a translator. The original project was intended to produce a film as a follow-up to our award-winning documentary, “The Response: How Puerto Ricans are Restoring Power to the People,” but have had to put it on the back burner for some time due to a lack of funding. Please contact theresponse@shareable.net if you would like to support bringing this story to the screen.

The post Modern-day colonialism and the tragic fate of an indigenous water and land protector appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
https://www.shareable.net/modern-day-colonialism-and-the-tragic-fate-of-an-indigenous-water-and-land-protector/feed/ 0 51064
How to free the soil by depaving https://www.shareable.net/how-to-free-the-soil-by-depaving/ https://www.shareable.net/how-to-free-the-soil-by-depaving/#respond Tue, 13 Aug 2024 14:30:05 +0000 https://www.shareable.net/blog/how-to-free-the-soil-by-depaving/ How much thought do you give to pavement? Our cities are covered with it, but it’s not exactly a hot topic of conversation (though it should be!) Pavement causes all sorts of problems—water can’t soak through it and instead runs across it, collecting pollutants and biological contaminants that make their way into waterways, plants, animals,

The post How to free the soil by depaving appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
How much thought do you give to pavement? Our cities are covered with it, but it’s not exactly a hot topic of conversation (though it should be!) Pavement causes all sorts of problems—water can’t soak through it and instead runs across it, collecting pollutants and biological contaminants that make their way into waterways, plants, animals, and ourselves.

But there is a way to reestablish balanced ecosystems by a process called depaving: the act of removing pavement and freeing up the soil below. Depave, a Portland-based nonprofit promoting the “transformation of over-paved places,” put together a guide to help people depave in their communities.

As How to Depave: The Guide to Freeing Your Soil states, “The removal of impervious pavements will reduce stormwater pollution and increase the amount of land available for habitat restoration, urban farming, trees, native vegetation, and beauty, thus providing us with greater connections to the natural world.”

Here are Depave’s key points to depaving.

Preparation

Before you start tearing pavement up, do some research. Things to consider include how water interacts with the site, what drainage currently exists, and where the downspouts from existing buildings send water. There may be opportunities to disconnect downspouts from sewer lines and utilize the newly-depaved area for on-site infiltration.

Depave suggests contacting your local city or county for guidance on stormwater retrofit information and design. You’ll need to find out how removing pavement will affect adjacent areas. For a first-time depaving project, start with a small lot of 500 square feet or less. The guide also suggests that you discuss the project with the property owner and get written approval.

depaving; Once you've depaved, you can get to work creating a garden or greenspace. Credit: Depave
Depaving can transform a boring slab of concrete into a lively greenspace. Credit: Depave

1. Determine site history and soil health

Before you depave, determine the condition of the underlying soil. Start by researching the site’s history. You can do this at your local library or assessor’s office or by viewing land deeds.

Lead is a common urban soil contaminant you may find, from lead paint, older construction, and older houses. Depave recommends testing for lead, cadmium, hydrocarbons, arsenic, and organochlorine pesticides if the post-depave plan includes growing food.

If you find these contaminants, Depave discourages removing pavement as the contamination is capped and is not causing any severe negative environmental or health impacts. “Unless there is a cleanup plan in place,” they write, “removing the pavement may do more harm than good.”

Another test to run is an infiltration test. This will help determine if the soil is suitable for certain types of stormwater management systems. This test measures how quickly water can soak in and flow through the soil and can be easily performed. The How to Depave appendices provide detailed step-by-step instructions for testing soil.

Before you depave, create a plan for removal of the pavement. Credit: Depave

2. Develop a site plan

Once you’ve determined the site conditions, create a plan for improving the space. As Depave explains, “A well executed depaving can help revitalize a neighborhood space with features that can: manage stormwater, provide habitat diversity for urban wildlife, reduce the urban heat island effect, and/or provide garden space for community members.”

Depaved sites can also be used as stormwater management devices. Common ways to do this include:

  • Vegetated bioswales, which slow runoff
  • Rain gardens, which store runoff until it can be infiltrated into the ground
  • Planters, including infiltration planters, contained planters, and flow-through planters, which beautify the site and slow runoff
  • Trees and naturescaping with evergreen trees and native plants, which also beautify the site and slow runoff
  • Learning gardens for people to experience growing food and plants in an educational setting
  • Community food gardens and orchards. These can have raised beds for soils with low permeability or if there is any possible soil contamination, and individual garden plots to provide garden space for many people and build community around the garden

3. Seek approval for your plan

Before depaving, you’ll also need a detailed drawing of the site, including any proposed changes. Your city may require this, which will help determine what materials will be needed, the budget, and how the project will look when it is complete. You may also need permits from various city departments.

From the Depave guide: “Your site plan should clearly depict: where you propose to depave, a scale, a north arrow, elevation points and water flow across the site, stormwater drains, important project notes, as well as existing and proposed structures and trees. These drawings do not need to be polished documents, but do need to be drawn to scale and thoroughly detail the elements of your proposal.”

Reach out to the community when creating your plan. You may find design professionals who can help create and visualize your design for a future green space.

depaving; Once you've depaved, you can get to work creating a garden or greenspace. Credit: Depave
With depaving, many hands make lighter work, so call in help from the community. Credit: Depave

4. Create a plan for recycling the pavement

When it comes to depaving, you’ll need to determine what surface material you’ll be removing and what you’ll do with it once you’ve removed it. Concrete can be repurposed and reused to construct walkways, flower beds, fire pits, retaining walls, and other outdoor structures. Local pavement processing companies can recycle asphalt into a crushed rock aggregate used in construction projects.

5. Prepare the pavement

Before removing concrete, you’ll need to break it up with a jackhammer. Asphalt must be cut with a walk-behind saw to cut it into slabs, which can be removed by hand. Before you depave, have a 10-yard dumpster delivered to your site to collect materials.

Once the pavement is cut and broken up, you’ll need hand tools to remove the pieces one-by-one. Tools and supplies needed include:

  • Pry bar
  • Pick axe
  • Sledgehammer
  • Wheelbarrow
  • Hand truck
  • Gloves
  • Closed-toe shoes and long pants
  • Eye protection
  • Ear protection
  • Dust mask

Depaving techniques

Now comes the actual removal of the pavement. If it was cut into squares, start with a pickaxe or pry bar. You can cut and remove small triangles at the corners of a few squares to give yourself places to start.

Start at a corner and use a pry bar to get under the slab. Leverage the slab with the pry bar on one end and have someone do the same on the other. This should be enough to get the heavy slab off the ground.

Have at least two people lift the slab into a wheelbarrow. The wheelbarrow will be very heavy and can easily tip over, so Depave cautions against overfilling it.

Now you need to get the asphalt from the wheelbarrow to the dumpster. There are two ways to do this:

  1. Ramp it: You can either use a big piece of plywood or rent a metal ramp at any local tool rental location
  2. Throw it: Carefully toss smaller pieces over the edge
Depaving is messy work. Make sure volunteers are outfitted with gloves, dust masks and safety glasses. Credit: Depave

Make depaving a community event

Depaving is not easy work, but there are great payoffs. Make it a celebration for the whole community. Here are tips to create a fun and effective depaving event:

  • Promote the event to make sure you get plenty of volunteers
  • Provide food and drinks
  • Make sure there is plenty of shade for rest breaks
  • Prepare leaders ahead of time with the right safety procedures
  • Provide volunteers with gloves, glasses, and dust masks
  • Add other festivities and music
  • Try hosting your event in conjunction with other neighborhood activities

Post-depaving

Once you remove the pavement, there’s typically four to six inches of gravel. There are two ways to remove the gravel:

  1. With small sites, the gravel can easily be shoveled out of the newly depaved area. Gravel can be reused to create walkways through gardens, fill potholes, create drainage areas, and more
  2. For larger sites, the gravel can be removed using heavy machinery. You can hire a local contractor to do this work, or rent a small backhoe or bobcat from a heavy equipment facility and do it yourself.

If kept separate from other materials, gravel can be hauled away in a dropbox and recycled at a local reuse facility.

depaving; Once you've depaved, you can get to work creating a garden or greenspace. Credit: Depave
Once you’ve depaved, you can get to work creating a garden or greenspace. Credit: Depave

1. Restore the soil

Soil restoration is an important part of depaving, as pavement compacts soil and prevents it from being vital. The Depave guide explains,“The biggest problem caused by heavy impervious surfaces is soil compaction. The weight of the pavement crushes macropores—the small spaces between the soil aggregate—preventing water, air, and roots from moving through the soil.”

To break up the compacted soil at small sites, use a spading fork or pickaxe. For larger sites, you’ll want farm implements such as a deep-ripper or chisel plow.

Once the soil is broken up, mix in organic matter such as compost or a three-way blended soil mix to help create a healthier soil profile and bring your site back to life.

2. Landscape

From the Depave guide: “Now for the fun part! Using your site plan and planting plan as a guide, your team can begin to bring the site to life. While depaving is a great summer activity, plants shouldn’t go into the ground until fall, when the temperature is cooler. Determine the best time of year to begin planting in your area to ensure the highest possible survival rate for the plants. Organize volunteer work parties to space out the work over several days and many hands.”

For more information on depaving, see How to Depave: the Guide to Freeing Your Soil, by Depave.

This article was originally published on April 15, 2015, and was most recently updated on August 13, 2024.

Check out these related articles:

The post How to free the soil by depaving appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
https://www.shareable.net/how-to-free-the-soil-by-depaving/feed/ 0 16334
How to host a permablitz https://www.shareable.net/how-to-host-a-permablitz/ https://www.shareable.net/how-to-host-a-permablitz/#respond Mon, 20 May 2024 13:15:43 +0000 https://www.shareable.net/blog/how-to-host-a-permablitz/ Ever wanted to transform your yard into a garden but didn’t know how? Well, much like the Amish tradition of barn raising, a permablitz is a way of bringing the community together and turning a suburban house into an urban homestead in a single day. The original permablitz network was established by Adam Grub and

The post How to host a permablitz appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
Ever wanted to transform your yard into a garden but didn’t know how? Well, much like the Amish tradition of barn raising, a permablitz is a way of bringing the community together and turning a suburban house into an urban homestead in a single day.

The original permablitz network was established by Adam Grub and Dan Palmer, and (as of 2012) more than 140 permablitzes have been held in Melbourne, Australia. The concept has since spread across Australia, and begun to move overseas to countries such as the U.K., the U.S., and Canada.

As a blitz host, you’re about to receive a big input of labor, design and energy. Permablitzes are great fun, but do require some work getting ready for. You’ll be expected to work with a designer, organize materials, do some prep work, and most importantly, feed your volunteers. In fact, you may not be doing much work at all in the garden on the day of the blitz, as hosts often find themselves in the kitchen instead. The permablitz network will help you with your design, come up with the quantities of materials needed, facilitate the day, and provide some follow up help if needed.

Below are tips for creating and running your own permablitz.

1.Design

Every permablitz must incorporate permaculture design, therefore someone who’s completed a Permaculture Design Certificate (PDC) needs to work with you to draft up a design for your garden.

Finding a designer 

  • Once you’ve been to a few blitzes and have decided that you want to host your own, it will be easier for your network to connect you to a permaculture designer.
  • A good design is the difference between you doing the clearing, digging, fertilizing, and pest control for your new veggie patch — or your rotationally fenced chooks (that’s an Australian chicken) doing the work for you. Isn’t it smarter to let the chickens gorge themselves on grass, weeds, and bugs; dig through soil; poo in it; and hand over eggs into the bargain? In short, you need an ultra-smart, well-integrated garden design.
  • Work with your designer to create a plan that you are willing to commit to over the long haul. It is more important to get a great, long-term design established during your permablitz, than it is to complete all the work in one day. Use your blitz day to break the back of that design, then keep adding to and refining your project slowly, over the years.
  • At the end of the design process you should have a to-scale sketch, explanatory notes and brief implementation guidelines. In order to achieve this the designer(s) usually need a minimum of 3-4 hours consulting with you and developing the design on-site.

2. Prepare for the day.

Find a facilitator

Generally the host isn’t expected to facilitate the blitz (although some do). 

  • There should be one or more facilitators — usually one of the designers or someone else from within the permablitz network.
  • For a particularly complex blitz, up to five or more facilitators and team leaders may be needed, whereas for a very simple blitz you may only need one facilitator.
  • Your network should have access to a list of potential facilitators if you are having trouble finding them.
  • If needed, there are Facilitators’ Guides available like this one from the Permablitz Melbourne network.

Set a date

  • Work with the designer and facilitator(s) to set a date for the permablitz
  • Generally you’ll want to give yourself a few weeks to prepare and time to promote
  • the event. 
  • It’s not usually a major consideration if there are other blitzes on the same day, but we would recommend finding a date that does not have other blitzes scheduled.
  • Most blitzes are scheduled on weekends, but if you are feeling adventurous (or you have a small project) try hosting one on a weekday!
  • Let your network know so they can add it to their online calendar and social media, and assist with promotion.
There is fun for everyone in a garden! Photo credit: Permablitz.
There is fun for everyone in a garden! Photo credit: Permablitz. Used with permission.

Gather materials

  • The designer’s report should include a list of materials such as length of pipes, cubic meters of mulch, height of newspaper piles, etc. 
  • Some materials such as cardboard and horse manure can often be sourced for free. 
  • If you have a list of materials that you need that you would like to crowdsource, post a list of your needs on your network’s website and social media accounts.
  • Take your permablitz design to your local nurseries and garden centers; your network may already have arranged discounts with particular nurseries, but if not, these businesses may offer discounts for large projects.

Promote your permablitz

  • Again, utilize your network’s website, mailing lists, and social media.
  • You may also wish to invite neighbors or other members of the local community to your blitz. 
  • Another good way to let people know about the blitz is to put up notices in like-minded businesses such as your local coffee shop, your local co-op, and/or your workplace’s newsletter. 
  • Remember to play up “what’s in it for them (the volunteers)” angle: learning new skills; free food and drink; potential volunteers for their permablitz; meeting new friends; etc.
  • Be sure to make it an RSVP event where respondents must email you to get the address, which not only adds an air of “exclusivity, but also so that you can track numbers.
  • Make sure that you respond to any inquiries straight away, and keep your volunteers informed along the way with email blasts showing the plans, pictures of your yard, and any other information to keep them interested and excited for the big day. 

Bookings and numbers

  • Track volunteer numbers so that you can not only anticipate mouths to feed, you can also control the number of volunteers. 
  • Too much energy in any system creates chaos and disorder so we recommend limiting the number of people attending your blitz to 15 – 20 people.

The number of people you can handle depends on:

  • The size of the property
  • The amount of work to be done
  • Whether there are additional facilitators/supporters who can run workshops throughout the day to soak up all the spare energy and make sure people have a good time.
  • Encouraging people to arrive at different times in the day can also be helpful;  this ensures that. as one group of people begins to fade, new, energetic sorts can kick in and start things all over again.

Health and Safety 

Prior to the permablitz, the host’s role is to deal with any obvious safety issues. 

  • Don’t plan to fell any trees or large branches on the day, or other potentially dangerous activities. 
  • As well, the host is responsible for locating underground lines and hazards well in advance of the blitz. 
  • Contacting your electric company is a good idea.
  • It’s the facilitator’s role on the day to draw attention to any dangerous tools, like mattocks or power tools. They should also discuss proper back care, and highlight any safety issues specific to the site.

 

A mapped out permaculture garden for a Permablitz
A mapped-out permaculture garden. Photo credit: United Diversity.

3. Finally, permablitz day!

  • Create a game plan with your designer and facilitator(s) ahead of time so that they can provide practical direction and support and try to find out who amongst your volunteer crew has the specialist skills that you will need (like bricklaying or carpentry) in advance.
  • Hosts need to make sure they have enough materials on hand — enough timber, mulch, shovels, saws, and screwdrivers, etc., to finish the job. 
  • Have a registration sheet for volunteers and greet people as they arrive.
  • Give them a name tag, a marker, and masking tape for their tools, as well as the itinerary of the day. 
  • Make sure to post site and design plans around the blitz area.
  • Have beverages and snacks ready, and make sure they are available throughout the day. 

The best blitzes are the result of adequate preparation in the lead-up to the event, and crazy, constructive improvisation on the day.

It’s fun. You’ll like it.

This how-to guide was originally posted on July 29, 2013. It was updated and reposted on Monday, May 20, 2024.

The post How to host a permablitz appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
https://www.shareable.net/how-to-host-a-permablitz/feed/ 0 10450
Unequal protection revisited: planning for environmental justice and critical infrastructure https://www.shareable.net/cities_tufts/planning-for-environmental-justice-critical-infrastructure/ https://www.shareable.net/cities_tufts/planning-for-environmental-justice-critical-infrastructure/#respond Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:01:37 +0000 https://www.shareable.net/?p=44196 Editor’s Note: Shareable is partnering with Tufts University on this special series hosted by professor Julian Agyeman (Co-chair of Shareable’s Board) and Cities@Tufts. Initially designed for Tufts students, faculty, and alumni, the colloquium has been opened up to the public with the support of Shareable, and The Kresge Foundation. Cities@Tufts Lectures explores the impact of

The post Unequal protection revisited: planning for environmental justice and critical infrastructure appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
Editor’s Note:

Shareable is partnering with Tufts University on this special series hosted by professor Julian Agyeman (Co-chair of Shareable’s Board) and Cities@Tufts. Initially designed for Tufts students, faculty, and alumni, the colloquium has been opened up to the public with the support of Shareable, and The Kresge Foundation.

Cities@Tufts Lectures explores the impact of urban planning on our communities and the opportunities to design for greater equity and justice.

Register to participate in future Cities@Tufts events here.

Below is the audio, video, and full transcript from a presentation on October 27, 2021, “Unequal Protection Revisited: Planning for Environmental Justice, Hazard Vulnerability, and Critical Infrastructure in Communities of Color” with Marccus D Hendricks. 

The impact of hazard exposures such as stormwater runoff is rarely evenly felt across a community. Neighborhoods of color, particularly of low-wealth, will often face worse stormwater problems especially in the era of climate change with more frequent and intense stormwater runoff.

In this lecture, Dr. Marccus Hendricks discusses the equity and environmental justice issues related to stormwater infrastructure planning that result in vulnerable systems leading to everyday challenges in stormwater and more extreme urban flooding. Specifically, he will examine conceptual frameworks and contextualize what it means for physical systems to operate in a social world.

Listen to “Unequal Protection Revisited: Planning for Environmental Justice, Hazard Vulnerability, and Critical Infrastructure in Communities of Color” on the Cities@Tufts Podcast (or on the app of your choice):

Image result for apple podcast - landscape agency Cities@Tufts on spotify - planning Stitcher Logo (Black BG) - landscape agency Google Podcasts: Cities@Tufts - planning

 

“Unequal Protection Revisited: Planning for Environmental Justice and Critical Infrastructure” Transcript

Marccus Hendricks: [00:00:06] For anybody who studies disasters like myself or any other crisis, for that matter, understands that social stratification is inherent within any of these crises or disaster scenarios. However, little to no attention has been paid to where and on whom the burdens of this decaying infrastructure fall heaviest within this national infrastructure crisis.

Tom Llewellyn: [00:00:31] Could Rio’s favelas offer a sustainable housing model for cities around the world? What are the impacts of overpolicing Black mobility in the U.S.? Are $16 tacos leading to gentrification and the emotional, cultural, economic and physical displacement it produces? These are just a few of the questions we’ll be exploring on this season of Cities@Tufts Lectures, a weekly free event series and podcast where we explore the impact of urban planning on our communities and the opportunities to design for greater equity and justice. I’m your host, Tom Llewellyn. In addition to this audio, you can watch the video and read the full transcript of this lecture and discussion on sharable.net. And while you’re there, get caught up on all of our past lectures. And now here’s Professor Julian Agyeman, who will welcome you to the Cities@Tufts Fall colloquium and introduce today’s lecturer.

Julian Agyeman: [00:01:29] Welcome to the Cities@Tufts colloquium, along with our partners Shareable and the Kresge Foundation and the Barr Foundation. I’m Professor Julian Ageman and together with my research assistants Perri Shinebaum and Caitlin McLennan, we organize Cities@Tufts as a cross-disciplinary academic initiative, which recognizes Tufts University as a leader in urban studies, urban planning and sustainability issues. We’d like to acknowledge that Tufts University’s Medford campus is located on colonized Wampanoag and Massachusetts territory.

[00:02:01] Today, we are delighted to welcome Marccus Hendricks. Marccus is an assistant professor of urban studies and planning and the director of the Stormwater Infrastructure Resilience and Justice Laboratory at the University of Maryland. To date, he’s primarily worked to understand how social processes and development patterns create hazardous human-built environments, vulnerable infrastructure and the related risks in urban stormwater management and flooding. Impressively, he’s received two early career awards from both the National Academies of Science Gulf Research Program and the JPB Environmental Health Fellows Program at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health. More recently, he was named as a 2021 fixer by the media company Grist for their annual Grist 50 Fixers list and has been appointed to Springer Nature’s US Research Advisory Council, the US EPA Science Advisory Board, and he’s been an author on the Human Social Systems chapter of the 5th National Climate Assessment.

[00:03:06] Marccus’s Talk today is “Unequal Protection Revisited: Planning for environmental justice, hazard vulnerability and critical infrastructure in communities of color.” Marcus, a Zoom-tastic welcome to the Cities@Tufts colloquium. As usual, microphones off please and send questions through the chat function. Over to you Marccus.

“Unequal Protection Revisited: Planning for Environmental Justice and Critical Infrastructure” Lecture

Marccus Hendricks: [00:03:29] Thank you so much, Julian, for that wonderful introduction. This moment seems sort of surreal to me, mostly because I’ve been introduced — to be introduced and engaged by a scholar whose work I’ve followed and referenced for many years since my time in a doctoral program. And so, you know, really appreciative for the invitation from you all to join you all for this wonderful colloquium. And so thank you again for having me. And again, Julian, thank you for your many contributions to the movement, EJ movement, as well as the discipline. I really appreciated it. And hopefully if I leave a good enough impression, we can do this again in the future, but in person.

[00:04:14] And so again, my name is Dr. Marccus Hendricks and I’m an assistant professor of urban studies and planning and the director of the Stormwater Infrastructure Resilience and Justice Lab here at the University of Maryland. Today, I want to unpack for you all the origins of my current research program and laboratory as an environmental planner with this talk entitled: “Unequal Protection Revisited.” And in this work, I sort of take a comprehensive approach to address some important issues related to disparities in stormwater infrastructure provision at the neighborhood level and how those things can have some serious implications in light of environmental outcomes and disaster resiliency.

[00:05:00] But before I get into the talk, I really want to take a moment to preface it by providing some brief insight into who I am and how I got involved in this work. Unfortunately, it’s so incredibly rare for folks that look like me, come from similar places and share common experiences to make it to moments like this. And so with every opportunity I get, I like to make it real for folks and make clear that the work that I do is a matter of lived experience, anchored in a robust research framework and tested systematically to provide evidence and direct support of ideally rewriting the narrative and transforming communities that currently live at the margins of our society.

[00:05:46] I was born and raised in Dallas, Texas. Dallas is the top in the top 10 largest cities in the country and one of the fastest growing cities in the world. Over the years, Dallas has done some notable work for a city in Texas in terms of urban revitalization and has continued to add to why it’s one of the more recognizable skylines in the country. However, my experience and perspective growing up in Dallas had a unique duality about it. On one hand, I thought and still do think that I grew up in one of the best cities in the country. And on the other hand, I was consistently disappointed by the things that plagued my community particularly that wasn’t necessarily characteristic of other communities and the city as a whole.

[00:06:32] I grew up in a low income Black and Latinx community in inner city Dallas, an area where low wealth neighborhoods are overburdened by toxic and waste treatment facilities. Our Black neighborhoods have more liquor and tobacco stores than they do healthy food outlets and grocery markets. Or Where a female headed households and multifamily housing stock is surrounded by bad streets, and it floods all the time. And my experience was just that. I was raised by a single mother and we lived and what most folks would consider the hood where our house was flooded on multiple occasions. The street that I grew up on specifically was a street by the name of Stanley Smith Drive, and perpendicular to my street was a street by the name of Prosperity Avenue. The ironic thing about it was that nothing about my neighborhood that was built for us was prosperous or becoming for the folks that lived there.

[00:07:27] In fact, I would notice that the drainage and ditches in my neighborhood looked distressed and are always filled with litter, trash and debris and pooling water. And when I traveled across town to other neighborhoods, I would notice a stark difference in the quality and appearance of their infrastructure. And from that point, I began to question what was it about my neighborhood that created these circumstances and built environments, not only for for my community, but similar communities? And that fundamentally is an intuition that has led me here today and shaped my current research agenda.

[00:08:02] And so at the University of Maryland, I direct a newly established research laboratory by the name of the Stormwater Infrastructure, Resilience and Justice Lab. And I like to say that that we take a social lens to what is largely been studied as a physical process. We focus on how infrastructure planning, environmental planning hazard mitigation and disaster recovery planning and participatory planning interact and shape people’s everyday lives and their lives during times of extreme events. And at the nexus of these four domains of planning, we think about the effects of infrastructure on the environment, essentially how we preserve our natural and green spaces and reduce our carbon footprint and the balance between gray and green assets and thinking about critical infrastructure.

[00:08:53] We also explore the role of infrastructure in modifying hazard risk, essentially how the type, location, condition of different environmental features can shape an area’s exposure to environmental and climate related hazards. We also think about infrastructure design, land use, smart growth and how we concentrate our assets in a smart way and streamline the utility of infrastructures. Likewise, we think about how infrastructure can oftentimes be used to guide or control development. And when municipalities lay down basic infrastructure, it can act as a catalyst and incentive for other types of development. We also think about civic participation and civic participation as a cornerstone of our work in ensuring that communities are meaningfully engaged and leveraging the intuition and brilliance and ongoing work of communities through community science and overseeing the management of infrastructure and filling data gaps to advocate on their own behalf.

 [00:09:57] And last but certainly not least rooting this research program in equity and environmental justice issues in terms of procedural distributive and restorative justice and thinking about, again, `the ways in which infrastructure in communities of color and low wealth communities is usually marginalized and similar to the ways in which those groups have been socially marginalized and thinking about how we can address those equity and EJ issues head on.

[00:10:28] And so amongst a number of climate induced hazards that we’ve seen across the world recently, urban flooding is one such phenomenon that has grown in terms of national reporting, academic literature and lived experience for many cities across the country. Some of the major U.S. urban flooding events that we’ve seen recently have happened in Houston in 2017 tropical storm Harvey, where we saw that some parts of Houston received more than 50 inches of rainfall, where total damages from the event were estimated upwards of $125 billion. And the storm was directly responsible for 68 deaths, which is the largest number of direct deaths from a hurricane or tropical storm in Texas since 1919. And something that’s interesting about this event and phenomenon was that 68 percent of the flooded homes are actually outside of the one hundred year flood plain, which is the traditional boundary by which we anticipate homes to be flooded. 

[00:11:36] But these urban flooding events haven’t just limited to areas that have seen these catastrophic events repetitively in recent years. In my new home, Washington DC, we’ve had our fair share of record rainfall. In fact, in 2019, we saw nearly four inches of rainfall — a month’s total fell in just one hour. Some of the roads in our nation’s capital received as much as five feet of water. More than one hundred rescues were made and eight thousand households lost power.

[00:12:10] But this issue of urban flooding is not just the issue of water quantity, but also of water quality. The failure to maintain and rehabilitate our infrastructure systems, as well as changing environmental conditions, have created some pre-modern circumstances in communities across the country, including that of Baltimore, Maryland, which is frequently experienced what we call sanitary sewer overflows or basement backups due to aging and declining sanitation infrastructure, and more frequent and intense rainfall events. And so not only do we have to think about these issues in the context of water quantity, but also of water quality.

[00:12:51] And so what are the global commonalities amongst these sort of urban flooding events where we know that rainfall is a major contributing factor in terms of moving the impact of flooding beyond these traditional coastal or riverine flood zones? We also know that the amount and location of impervious cover is most predominant in high density areas is increasing the amount of stormwater runoff. And lastly, we know that stormwater infrastructure has been unable to cope with the amount of stormwater runoff during these events, leading to further flooding.

[00:13:28] And this factor of stormwater infrastructure is really where I want to focus our attention throughout the rest of this lecture. Because amongst a number of crises that we’re facing nationally and globally, we’re also facing an infrastructure crisis in terms of collapsing bridges in California and overflowing storm drains in Houston. A lot of our nation’s infrastructure systems are past their prime, and decaying infrastructure is all around us. In fact, the American Society of Civil Engineers gave the U.S. infrastructure at a national level a C-minus in their most recent report card, just shy of a failing score. The predecessors said there’s a more recent report — we actually received a D-plus, an actual failing score. And so this phenomenon has been well documented.

[00:14:19] But for anybody who studies disasters like myself or any other crises for that matter, understands that social stratification is inherent within any of these crises or disaster scenarios. However, little to no attention has been paid to where on and whom the burdens of this decaying infrastructure fall heaviest within this national infrastructure crisis. And that’s where my work comes into play in leaning on these two bodies of literature between environmental justice and social vulnerability to disaster and specifically with environmental justice. Thinking about how the nation’s environmental laws, regulations, policies haven’t been applied fairly across all segments of the population. In Social vulnerability, we think about the ways in which social stratification along the lines of race, income, mobility, gender, age, nationality, among other factors, contribute to differential risk and impacts in these disaster scenarios.

 [00:15:20] Specific mentions of infrastructure in both of these bodies of literature come from folks like Dr. Robert Bullard in 1994, when he charged the nation to redefine environment to include infrastructure. Shannon Van Zandt followed up in 2012, talking about the ways in which infrastructure and other environmental features can modify vulnerabilities and potentially exacerbate risk. Dr. Sacoby Wilson in 2008 talked about how the failure of municipalities to install up to code sewer and water infrastructure can lead to vulnerabilities in these systems, particularly among poor people of color residents.

[00:16:01] And so what we have in play are these larger social processes of redlining and historical racial zoning, chronic unemployment, substandard housing, high poverty rates and ongoing economic disinvestment, residential segregation and discriminatory planning that shape these larger infrastructural processes in terms of the inventory, condition, and distribution of infrastructure systems and even the materials and the type of equipment that we use to install and construct these infrastructure systems. And also the maintenance and rehabilitation decision trees related to, again, the management of these systems over a life cycle. And these infrastructure processes are fundamentally shaped and driven by these larger social processes.

[00:16:52] And I’ll talk about this in a recent publication that stems from my dissertation, entitled, the same title of my talk today, “Unequal Protection, Planning for Environmental Justice, Hazard Vulnerability and Critical Infrastructure in Communities of Color.” And toward the end of this piece, I offer this framework that really draws the relationship between variables that are associated with social vulnerability and environmental justice, and how those things drive neighborhood factors and inequalities that are fundamentally connected to the built environment and the infrastructure systems that operate within our built environment. And how those things might lead to differential hazard risk, exposure, and disaster recovery outcomes, whether it’s natural or climate related hazards, environmental hazards, technological or public health hazards.

[00:17:50] And I want to pause here quickly to say and be clear that when we’re thinking about the ways in which race, ethnicity, class, gender drive, sort of these environmental factors, these inequalities and the impacts that those things have on infrastructure and hazard risk, it’s a matter of racism and classism and sexism because I don’t think that groups are inherently vulnerable, but there are human processes, social processes, human built environments and decisions that are made that create these circumstances by which these groups are marginalized. And I always want to be clear about that in terms of debunking this myth that these groups are in fact inherently vulnerable.

[00:18:35] And so within this framework, the overarching research questions that I ask related to my program is, what is the general inventory in terms of the type and location of various infrastructure systems, namely stormwater? And what is the context in terms of the basic premise and design behind these systems? Furthermore, I ask how do social variables associated with environmental justice and social vulnerability in terms of race ethnicity class — how do those factors drive the inventory, condition, and distribution of these various systems at the neighborhood level?

[00:19:14] I actually started this work back in 2014, 2015 as a part of my dissertation research and looking at a particular system of open ditches, a type of stormwater infrastructure that is traditionally been established for our rural and agricultural type land uses. It’s a V-shaped or U-shaped channel that’s expected to help with roadside stormwater runoff. These open ditches tend to be a simpler and cheaper option relative to other types of stormwater infrastructure. However, they also require more regular and routine maintenance to prevent silt and debris buildup. And surprisingly enough, the regular maintenance of these open ditches and municipalities is usually the responsibility of the adjacent property owner, and reports on these types of stormwater infrastructure systems have shown that they’re perceived to be less desirable by community members and residents. 

[00:20:14] And in Houston, specifically where some of these systems are located, The American Society of Civil Engineers reported that these systems are likely to be inundated by a more common everyday flood rainfall event. And so, you know, we think about the level of rainfall that Houston received from tropicall storm Harvey, these systems didn’t stand a chance. And so early on in my research I looked at case an open distance in Houston, Texas, and was able to empirically demonstrate that the distribution of these open systems were primarily driven by the percentage of Black residents that were located at the neighborhood level – particularly the census black group level. And these images are just images of open ditches at various condition levels in one particular community that are engaged in a more meaningful way around some community sites and participatory work that I’ll talk about briefly a little later.

[00:21:18] But since then, I’ve taken that early work that’s currently under review for publication and expanded in and then applied it to My new home here in Washington, D.C., and it appears that D.C. and the Capitol building are at a threat of multiple storms — one more explicitly manmade, the other more natural or climate oriented. But I think either way, if we think about the circumstances in a context of environmental justice and anti-racism, we can help to address some of these issues.

[00:21:51] And so I’m sure we all are familiar with D.C. as the nation’s capital, located on the northern shore of both the Potomac River and the Anacostia and borders the states of Maryland and Virginia. Annually, D.C. receives approximately about 40 inches of precipitation across a sixty-one square mile area. And D.C. has had its fair share of disaster declarations over the years. And again, I think more recently, we’re seeing this new normal of flash flood events that have taken place in the nation’s capital in terms of a tremendous amount of rainfall dropping in the short period of time that has crippled the movement of people, goods, services and operations in our nation’s capital.

[00:22:38] And so before I get into the empirical analyses that I’ve done along these lines of infrastructure, inequalities, and disparities within the district, I really want to explain the types of stormwater systems that the district currently has. And so there are two types of systems that exist within Washington, D.C. And so we have MS4s (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems) for which is a municipal separate sewer stormwater system by which stormwater runoff is managed by a separate system and underground pipe network from sanitary sewer. And so wastewater and stormwater in a separate system are managed by two different pipe network systems.

[00:23:24] There’s also these combined systems by which stormwater runoff and wastewater are managed within the same pipe network system. Most municipalities west of the Mississippi have these separate systems within the mid-Atlantic and Northeasern corridors these outer municipalities that have existed. Some of these cities still have combined systems where they manage both stormwater and wastewater in the same pipe network. In D.C., D.C. has a combination of some portions of the city have separated sewer and stormwater, some portions of the city have combined, and so it has a mixture of again stormwater infrastructure, wastewater, and combined systems.

 [00:24:12] And so in thinking about the distribution of these piped networks within the District of Columbia, I ask these same basic questions in terms of the available infrastructure for communities in terms of managing stormwater runoff and wastewater and what that looks like, particularly across socially vulnerable communities. And so I took a spatial dataset and aggregated it at the neighborhood or block group level and then applied a number of covariates or independent variables to control for it to look and see if disparities exist in terms of the total pipe length and capacity of raiin stormwater infrastructure within the District of Columbia.

[00:24:59] And what we were able to find was that socially vulnerable neighborhoods have less pipe width and capacity relative to non socially vulnerable communities within the District of Columbia. And this particular output model is showing length with the R squared of sixty eight percent. But we also ran the model for capacity, found similar results in terms of showing that socially vulnerable neighborhoods within the District of Columbia don’t have the same amount of pipe length or capacity relative to non-socially vulnerable communities.

[00:25:38] These issues of infrastructure inequality that lead to potential flood risk are pervasive. And moving just north of Washington, D.C., I’ve also started to do some work in the city of Baltimore. And Baltimore, Maryland is a majority Black city and the largest city in the state of Maryland, and it lies at the head of the Patapsco River and15 miles above the Chesapeake Bay watershed. And annually, Baltimore receives somewhere around fift-nine inches of rainfall that peaks in July and August, when thunderstorms average once every five days across an 80 square mile area.

[00:26:21] And within the city of Baltimore, over the past decade or more, according to the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Baltimore City has had more than thirty-nine hundred individual sewer overflow events spilling more than one hundred and ten million gallons of sewage-laden water into the streets, homes, streams and rivers of Baltimore and eventually into the Chesapeake Bay waters. And so again, issues of not only water quantity but water quality. In terms of these wet weather events, not only overwhelming storm water systems, but the interconnected, sometimes interconnected or proximal wastewater systems, and causing these overflows and backups into people’s homes.

[00:27:09] And so, as a part of one of my early career awards, I’ve started a series of research activities in Baltimore to really understand the root causes of some of these overflowing basement backup events. And some of those activities involved on the spatial analysis of 311 calls and a spatial analysis similar to what I did in Washington, D.C., in terms of looking at the distribution of wastewater infrastructure systems. I’m also doing some household surveys and environmental sampling to understand the residential experience with some of these basement backups and some of the impacts to both property and health that these residents have experienced and connecting that to public health issues in terms of doing floor swabs for residue or residual bacteria that’s left over from these basement backup events. And furthermore, I’m also doing in-depth interviews with stakeholders at both the local, state and federal level in terms of understanding, from their perspective, what is driving these issues and both infrastructure vulnerability and these basement backup events.

[00:28:21] And so again, to revisit this diagram, now we’re talking about Baltimore, who surprisingly has had a separate stormwater and wastewater system since the inception of the city. However, because the system is so old, even though it operates a separate stormwater and wastewater system, the proximity of the wastewater and the stormwater pipelines and the cracks that exist and the negative issues related to the condition and quality of these systems, we’re seeing during wet weather events not only that, the stormwater runoff is overwhelming the stormwater systems, but that water is leaking out into the wastewater systems and causing backups into people’s homes.

[00:29:06] And so some of my preliminary findings from conversations with these stakeholders is one issue of a political demarcation for a physically interconnected system. And so we have this issue where we have a property line that separates the responsibility between the property owner and the municipality in terms of when these backups occur, if there is damage or distress on one side of the property line that determines liability in terms of addressing these issues. The challenge with this is that these systems are interconnected, right? And so pressures and the stresses that one part of the system naturally have an impact on the quality and condition and stresses on other parts of the system. And so this property line of political demarcation is imaginary in many way, and one of the issues or findings that have come out of some of my preliminary themes and doing some of these interviews.

[00:30:08] Another thing that is emerged from my in-depth interviews is that we have legal mandates for habitats, but not for homes. And what I mean by that is that per the EPA regulations, the city of Baltimore is not allowed to pollute the Chesapeake Bay in terms of impacts of water quality, but they’re able to seal off what we call these outfalls that follow water into the Chesapeake Bay. And when you seal off these outfalls, the water has to go somewhere. And so what we’ve seen since this consent decree that the city of Baltimore has went into with the EPA, is that once they sealed off these outfalls protecting habitats in terms of the Chesapeake Bay, it’s caused this sewage-laden and water to actually back up into people’s homes. And so very interesting from a policy perspective in terms of how we have legal mandates again to protect these habitats, but not to protect people’s homes.

 [00:31:07] And a last preliminary thing that has come out is that we have this stigma with stink in terms of residents are embarrassed to come forward about having raw sewage in their home. And so it’s presented a challenge to the municipalities, the state, as well as researchers like myself in terms of engaging and understanding how we might support to address these issues. And so in order to overcome these circumstances, get a full sense of impact and vulnerability, we have to be sensitive and address these issues and recognizing the stigma to support these marginalized communities.

[00:31:46] And so with the take home message, and thinking about environmental justice, vulnerability and infrastructure, I really want you all to consider that equity and infrastructure includes procedural, distributive, and restorative justice. We have to recognize the built environment as a continuation of social circumstances, and that infrastructure dynamics have direct implications for risk exposure, ecological and public health outcomes in terms of water quality and water quality. And lastly, a lot of my early contributions to the science has been on the topic of community science, civic participation. And I think that these types of partnerships are a pillar in planning, public health and a myriad of other disciplines and is the democratic gateway to a more healthy, just, and resilient society.

[00:32:36] And so really quickly on that note, again, I’ve done some other work in terms of participation in community science and developing a participatory assessment technique for infrastructure by which I mobilize residents as community scientists to do an inspection of infrastructure quality. But I recognize that there’s a reluctance to embrace community science-derived data. And so immediately after developing this assessment technique, I partnered with engineers and tested community science data against trained engineers and LiDAR technology,  and we were able to empirically demonstrate that there wasn’t a statistically significant difference in the quality of data across these three different groups between trained engineers, LiDAR technology and community scientists.

[00:33:22] I’ve also worked with communities and developing grassroots master plans that include stormwater interventions and projectedthe initial construction cost and ongoing maintenance, as well as the potential performance of these systems, again, to connect these infrastructure inequalities and challenges with flood risk to the planning process and route those and local and community perspective. A number of current and ongoing research projects that I can talk a little bit more about if folks are interested in a Q&A. And so with that, I want to end on a number of pictures of me in the field doing field work from my various projects here at the University of Maryland from using, you know, IoT technology and frameworks to understand water quantity and quality, to engage in community scientists. And so thank you all again for having me. I look forward to any questions that you all might have. Thank you.

“Unequal Protection Revisited: Planning for Environmental Justice and Critical Infrastructure” Discussion

Julian Agyeman: [00:34:22] Fantastic, Marcus. Thank you very much for a really rich, theoretically-based, but empirically driven talk. Excellent. And you know, just between you and me, some of us who are much further in our careers in environmental justice have been thinking about the next generation of researchers and Marcus, you represent the finest of that generation. So good luck in future research and keep doing things that push the boundaries as you do. So lots of questions, of course. Brown House Watch Party, they’re always the big questioners and there’s two questions. And first one is how can efforts to restore and redistribute functional stormwater systems contribute to gentrification?

Marccus Hendricks: [00:35:06] Sure, sure, yeah, yeah, that’s a great question and actually a question that has come up recently from a reporter that I was actually talking with last week in thinking about Biden’s infrastructure bill and how that might impact communities, both in terms of getting their fair share of resources, but then also any improvements or modifications, especially in a positive sense, to the built environment. There is this threat of gentrification. And so there’s a lot of emerging literature thinking about green gentrification in a ways in which we install green infrastructure can spur this green gentrification. But I don’t think it’s limited to just green infrastructure. Any type of capital improvement or transformation to the built environment that has an impact on local tax bases that then drives up property values and price people out poses a threat in terms of gentrification.

[00:36:03] And so, one of the promising practices that I’ve seen to mitigate gentrification and to minimize the threat of it is this idea of community land trusts, right? And establishing a 501c3 where community members have a formal stake in both the local and the built environment and putting those things in place prior to development. So that way, community folks and residents already have both a formal, political, financial stake in the property throughout the neighborhood or community prior to any green installation or any other type of capital improvement. And so I think in doing some of this work it’`s something that’s on my radar. And again, working with folks who do more housing-oriented work and broader community neighborhood level work, it’s important to consider how we might address these issues head on and thinking about interventions like community land trusts. 

Julian Agyeman: [00:37:03] Great, thanks Marccus. Another question from Brown House Watch Party, if the government is unwilling to invest in improving national stormwater sewerage infrastructure, do you think that some of the cities and states initiatives implementing green infrastructure, green alleys, green roofs, biofuels etc. Are enough to mitigate the infrastructure crisis?

Marccus Hendricks: [00:37:25] Sure, that’s another really good question. And to be honest with you, some days I’m hopeful, other days I’m more cynical. Because I think that the reason why we’re in this national infrastructure crisis is really a matter of failure to maintain these assets over the life cycle. We’re so enamored with newness and these ribbon cutting ceremonies when we install or build new infrastructure. But maintaining these assets routinely is not as sexy as these ribbon cutting ceremonies, right? And also, too, I think that once we install these assets, it becomes sort of an invisible issue in terms of ongoing maintenance. But I think municipalities recognize that when it comes to green infrastructure, that these are natural living species and elements, and those things require more regular routine maintenance. And so there might be a reluctance because of that to install these systems. And that’s something that, again, I’m exploring in my work and thinking about more critically.

[00:38:28] Another thing I would say in terms of the crisis that we’re in, both in terms of infrastructure as well as climate, a piece that I wrote up with a colleague, Dr. Asian Dowtin for the American Water Resources Association, that we’re turning a public essay into a peer review article, we make the case for a hybridized approach to stormwater infrastructure that includes both gray and green systems. Because I think we’ve done so much damage to the surface level of our built environments and cities that I think we’re at a point where green infrastructure may not do the job entirely in terms of managing this runoff.

[00:39:12] And so we’re so polarizing in the literature in terms of now that we recognize that we damaged the built environment through impervious cover, now there’s this big push for green infrastructure. But I think we need to be careful and take our time in light of uncertainty of the characteristics of wet weather events and that I think a balanced approach that includes both gray and green systems might position us best to address that uncertainty as we transition to a more sustainable future.

Julian Agyeman: [00:39:42] Great, thanks Marccus. We have a question from Liz Sharp from the University of Sheffield in the UK. And she says, greetings from Sheffield UK, which, like most European cities, has an almost entirely combined network. So a question builds on Brown House’s question. And she said, could investment in green infrastructure be an opportunity for co-design with communities to make wonderful, new green spaces?

Marccus Hendricks: [00:40:08] Sure. I mean, I think co-design with communities that’s centered on green infrastructure, grey infrastructure, any type of development is key. And I think that residents take a stake in these developments when they’re formally engaged and are meaningfully engaged in terms of that planning process. And I think that, again, I talk about this a lot in my work, is that, myself as a planning scholar, my job is made that much more easier when I’m meaningfully engaged communities and residents because they have an intuition about the physical, the natural, political, economic dynamics of their area and how meaningful things to say in terms of the questions to ask, the methods to apply, and interpreting what we find and what those things look like in terms of policy. And so again, always want to reiterate that communities, again, have to be at the front and center of these conversations and these formal planning processes, whether it’s green infrastructure or otherwise

Julian Agyeman: [00:41:17] Deidre Zoll says great talk, thanks for your work. She says, I’ve been going back and forth with using SVI for analysis and was wondering if you have thoughts on using it vs measures of income, race, and ethnicity? I appreciate how SVI can help capture the multiple systems of oppression at play and things that might make people more exposed to risk/longer recovery. But, I’ve been wondering if it obscures the role of racial capitalism and pulls the focus away from how people, places, and goods/services are racialized.

Marccus Hendricks: [00:41:51] Sure, that’s another very good question, and I think whoever asked that question, or posed the question is a student in terms of thinking about sort of unpacking those variables to think about it in more explicit terms of race, ethnicity, class. And I think my approach to the work, honestly, and when I get a chance to get lost in the weeds of my models and data, are really taking both approaches. Taking a look at the outputs and the models when I apply both the Composite Social Vulnerability Index and when I break it down into those individual factors and comparing the two in terms of significance, effects, size and those types of things. And so I think it makes a lot of sense to be cautious, and I would encourage you to do as I’ve done in terms of testing both, as an index and as individual variables and making that comparison and ultimately a judgment call in terms of what makes the most sense in the context of that particular local area.

Julian Agyeman: [00:42:55] Scott Lewis asks, How does the future of sea level rise interact with this issue in coastal cities?

Marccus Hendricks: [00:43:02] Yeah, I actually recently cited a paper that talked about sea level rise and saltwater intrusion to some of these underground pipe networks, posing yet another risk in terms of the quality and condition of these systems that’s further deteriorating these systems. And so I think that’s one additional element that we have to consider as a threat to drown pipe networks. But I think also too, we’re at a point in time and it’s climate crises and these wet weather events that we’re seeing water come from all different directions, both the riverine floodplains, coastal areas as well as rainfall events. And so I think the combination of all of those things, especially in an area like Boston or Washington, D.C., we have to consider a number of these risk and threats in terms of water.

Julian Agyeman: [00:43:57] Ali Hiple asks, that’s such a powerful phrasing re: the legal mandate for habitats but not for homes. Broadly, are there other policy interventions at either the federal or state level that you see as a important in addressing this issue?

Marccus Hendricks: [00:44:12] Yeah. So I’m about halfway through my in-depth interviews with stakeholders around these issues of basement backups and overflows. And so I think part of the answer to that question is to be determined. But one of the other things that I’ve seen as a critical issue is that when it comes to the bureaucracy of local, state, or federal government, although these entities are supposed to center around the public good, we get caught in this conundrum of liability, right? And it becomes more about litigation as opposed to the public good. And I see that as a huge impediment to actually addressing these issues, especially in an equitable and just way.

[00:45:00] And so I’m not sure what has to happen to remove these political barriers and these legal barriers to actually get enough after the public good, whether it’s in the everyday situation, the basement backups or it’s in a larger disaster, a traditional disaster scenario. But I see that as a huge issue. And so we have to figure out how we remove the red tape, how we re-center the public good in addressing these issues.

[00:45:30] And I think, again, also thinking about applying risk frameworks that acknowledge the disproportionate impact and exposure of marginalized communities and bringing that to the table at the very beginning and addressing these issues. So that way we have the full context in terms of impacts is also critical and we have to embrace it. And I see some push at all levels of government in this moment, which I think Julian alluded to, in terms of really leveraging and taking full advantage to move forward this environmental justice agenda. And I think that we have an opportunity, but we have to keep our fingers on the pulse and keep pressing towards that mark.

Julian Agyeman: [00:46:14] Joshua Dickens is saying, I worked at a wastewater treatment plant where we managed water for nearby cities in addition to our own waters. What proposals have you considered? What proposals could you offer communities without independent infrastructure to address the challenges of stormwater or those cities and plants managing multiple? Joshua, if Marccus needs clarification, I’m hoping you’re around. Can you get that one, Marccus?

Marccus Hendricks: [00:46:43] So proposals to offer communities without independent infrastructure? I’m not sure if you’re referring to cases of municipal underbounding where they don’t have a formal jurisdiction or municipality that oversees infrastructure or if it’s a different question entirely?

Julian Agyeman: [00:47:04] Joshua, are you in the room still? Can you clarify for Marccus what you mean?

Joshua Dickens: [00:47:09] Yeah, I’m here. No, you have it. You got it. So essentially what you just said. So if there’s a wastewater treatment plant that’s managing multiple cities in addition to their own, so they’re they’re taking on a large haul of extreme weather events and so forth. How would you coach them to address those needs? Or coach the cities that don’t have the resources themselves to to address them?

Marccus Hendricks: [00:47:34] Sure. Sure, sure. Great question. You know, again, I think that we give lip service to these processes that involve analyzing communities that are more risky or, that are more socially vulnerable or have a legacy of environmental injustice. But then we don’t apply those frameworks and analyses and actually incorporate them into the planning and decision making that we do at the local level, right? And obviously, the past four years under the most recently passed administration, obviously a lot of those things got dismantled and suffocated. But now we see a re-emergence of, again, thinking about vulnerability and equity at the forefront of decision making related to infrastructure, disasters and beyond.

[00:48:26] And so I think it really requires doing sort of a entire community level analysis of which communities are more vulnerable relative to others. What’s the quality of the services that they’re receiving compared to others? And being transparent about those issues. As well as providing the — being transparent or making available the data where scientists and scholars can corroborate the findings of the municipalities in terms of the decisions that they’re making.

[00:48:56] And so I think, to answer the question, is that we have to do a full on analysis of coverage areas that are serviced by any particular waste treatment facility or utility jurisdiction to understand the experiences and the levels of services that certain communities are getting relative to others and then apply again that equity and justice framework to address the most marginalized and vulnerable areas amongst that service area to help communities that are suffering.

Julian Agyeman: [00:49:30] We have a question from Tiffany, who says, from a praxis frame, what would you advise residents to do to impact these water issues?

Marccus Hendricks: [00:49:39] Yeah, another good question and really peaking to the divide between public and private liability. And I think what I’ve seen and some of the data from conversations with these stakeholders is that the city is quick to point the finger to the private residents in terms of flushing — particularly Baltimore and thinking about these basement backups — are flushing inappropriate materials or wipes or litter or trash to bring down the wastewater system and pointing the finger across the property line in terms of saying, Oh, you know, it’s the residents that are causing these backups. And then of course, the residents are pointing their fingers across the property line to the city and saying that, no, it’s not our behaviors that’s causing these water quality issues or basement backups, but it’s the city’s infrastructure that’s not providing the level of service that’s sufficient and adequate.

[00:50:35] And so I think it’s a combination of it all. Again, I think these systems are, by design, interconnected and interdependent. And so I would advise residents to, again, take into consideration the things that they can do at the parcel and household level to mitigate some of these water issues, but then also always asking questions of their locally elected leadership and municipalities in terms of what these agencies are or aren’t doing in terms of these water issues. And again, creating some transparency in terms of the questions of who, what, when, where, why and how other communities are receiving certain services and how they’re being impacted relative to their communities to get a sense of the landscape and to, again, get at the root causes of some of these water quantity and quality issues.

Julian Agyeman: [00:51:32] Great, well, I think the last question is going to go to Justin Hollander, who’s a professor in our department, and Justin says, thank you so much for sharing your research with us. Really fascinating. In my own research in Baltimore, I’ve learned about efforts by the city to use vacant lots to help manage stormwater. What do you think of this strategy?

Marccus Hendricks: [00:51:51] Yeah, sure. Thanks, Justin. And I think the work that you’ve done over the years, Justin, probably gives a lot of insight in terms of what the city of Baltimore can do. And I think in thinking about declining cities like Baltimore or Detroit and how we repurpose these spaces for either green infrastructure or some alternative purpose is an opportunity to to reimagine the stormwater landscape, stormwater management landscape. And I think I have a doctoral student in landscape architecture here at the University of Maryland that’s looking at some of the ways that we repurpose these vacant lots and green spaces and efforts to manage stormwater. And so I definitely think that there’s an opportunity.

[00:52:38] The other challenge is that just because the city has been on decline doesn’t mean that it’ll decline forever. And then also, if we want to make other improvements to grow the city moving forward, what does that look like? How do we, again, find that sweet spot and balance of incorporating green infrastructure through these vacant spaces while also investing in other ways or not just leaving it as a vacant lot or repurposing it in a green way that brings up property values or serves some co-benefit or alternative purpose in addition to just to open green light or space for stormwater management. So I think a lot of opportunities, a lot of uncertainty, a lot of good questions to ask. And again, same to you, Justin, as I said to Julian, in terms of contributions that have laid the framework and the groundwork to exploring some of these issues.

Julian Agyeman: [00:53:38] Well, Marccus, I could go on asking you questions. I think you’ve had some really good questions there from from our people. This is one great interest area for us and of course, the theme of equity, social justice, infrastructure, governance — really, these are just key issues and never has the window of opportunity for researching these issues been so strong. So can we give a good UEP thank you to Marccus. Brilliant, brilliant presentation, Marccus. Really excellent answering all the questions. Next week we have Charles T. Brown from Rutgers on “Arrested Mobility: Exploring the impacts of over-policing Black mobility in the US.” So be sure to register for that. And again, Marccus, thanks and good luck in your tenure. I think you’re going to do very well, Marccus.

Marccus Hendricks: [00:54:32] Thank you so much, Julian. Thank you to everybody for having me. I really enjoyed it. Thank you.

Tom Llewellyn: [00:54:41] We hope you enjoyed this week’s lecture. Join us live for another event tomorrow or listen to the recording right here on the podcast next week. Cities@Tufts Lectures is produced by Tufts University and Shareable with support from the Kresge Foundation and the Barr Foundation. Lectures are moderated by Professor Julian Agyeman and organized in partnership with research assistants Perri Sheinbaum and Caitlin McLennan. “Light Without Dark” by Cultivate Beats is our theme Song. Robert Raymond is our audio editor. Zanetta Jones manages communications and editorial. And the series is produced and hosted by me, Tom Llewellyn. Please hit subscribe, leave a rating or review wherever you get your podcasts and share it with others so this knowledge can reach people outside of our collective bubbles. That’s it for this week’s show. Here’s a final thought.

Marccus Hendricks: [00:55:28] When we’re thinking about the ways in which race, ethnicity, class, gender drive these factors, these inequalities and the impacts that those things have on infrastructure and hazard risk, it’s a matter of racism and classism and sexism because I don’t think that groups are inherently vulnerable. But there are human processes, social processes, human built environments and decisions that are made that create these circumstances by which these groups are marginalized.

The post Unequal protection revisited: planning for environmental justice and critical infrastructure appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
https://www.shareable.net/cities_tufts/planning-for-environmental-justice-critical-infrastructure/feed/ 0 44196
Community resilience strategies in California https://www.shareable.net/response/community-resilience-strategies-in-california/ https://www.shareable.net/response/community-resilience-strategies-in-california/#respond Thu, 03 Jun 2021 15:00:35 +0000 https://www.shareable.net/?p=42893 As we’ve discussed at length on The Response podcast, climate change-fueled disasters are destructive, scary, and rapidly increasing in both frequency and impact all over the world. At this point, half of the global population has been affected by at least one climate change-fueled disaster (and the other half isn’t far behind). And California has

The post Community resilience strategies in California appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
As we’ve discussed at length on The Response podcast, climate change-fueled disasters are destructive, scary, and rapidly increasing in both frequency and impact all over the world.

At this point, half of the global population has been affected by at least one climate change-fueled disaster (and the other half isn’t far behind).

And California has been a microcosm of the global climate emergency.

For the past decade, communities across the state have faced severe challenges on multiple fronts — from extreme fires and flooding to earthquakes and the COVID-19 pandemic.

But how have they responded and what community resilience strategies have proved most successful?

In this episode of The Response, we explore some of the answers to these questions with two guest speakers

Lisa Beyer is an Urban Water Infrastructure Manager at World Resources Institute. As part of that role, she is responsible for developing and scaling financially innovative, environmentally sustainable municipal water management solutions in cities across the country.

Learn more about Lisa Beyer, World Resources Institute, and the Joint Benefits Authority (JBA) by visiting wri.org.

Greg Kochanowski is a licensed architect, an aspiring landscape architect, and educator in the State of California. His new book, The Wild, explores the urban periphery of Los Angeles, where the city meets the mountains, a landscape inherently vulnerable to wildfire, and its secondary and tertiary effects, including flash floods and debris flows.

Learn more about Greg Kochanowski and his book, “The Wild,” by visiting the-wild.org/

Listen to “Community Resilience Strategies in California” on The Response Podcast here (or on the app of your choice):

The Response is a podcast series from Shareable.net exploring how communities are building collective resilience in the wake of disasters

Episode credits:

*This episode features the audio recording from a webinar that was co-hosted by American Institute of Architects San Francisco (AIASF) and Center for Architecture and Design. As a result, here are several references to images that were shared by our presenters. The video recording of this talk can be accessed by becoming a member of AIASF.

Additional Stories:

The post Community resilience strategies in California appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
https://www.shareable.net/response/community-resilience-strategies-in-california/feed/ 0 42893
How Rights of Nature victories in Colombia’s rainforests can inform shared knowledge systems globally https://www.shareable.net/how-rights-of-nature-victories-in-colombias-rainforests-can-inform-shared-knowledge-systems-globally/ https://www.shareable.net/how-rights-of-nature-victories-in-colombias-rainforests-can-inform-shared-knowledge-systems-globally/#respond Tue, 04 Aug 2020 15:00:00 +0000 https://www.shareable.net/?p=40690 Rights of Nature is a movement that has been fortifying itself around the world as an antithesis to the dominant paradigm of limitless growth and extractivism. Firmly grounded in holistic Indigenous worldviews, this ecocentric paradigm could be a global game changer if a coordinated and adaptable effort — based on shared knowledge systems and accountability

The post How Rights of Nature victories in Colombia’s rainforests can inform shared knowledge systems globally appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
Rights of Nature is a movement that has been fortifying itself around the world as an antithesis to the dominant paradigm of limitless growth and extractivism. Firmly grounded in holistic Indigenous worldviews, this ecocentric paradigm could be a global game changer if a coordinated and adaptable effort — based on shared knowledge systems and accountability — is established.

Colombia, with its biological, cultural and hydrological richness, has become a trailblazer in legally formalizing Rights of Nature, beginning with the 2017 Judgement of the Atrato River, but to what end? Who will defend these rights against powerful legal and illegal natural resource exploiting interests in such a conflicted country, and how can these formal voices for nature be strengthened by tools of modern science and technology, as opposed to repressed by them? 

Colombia’s Choco: Illegal gold mining, conflict and a river with rights

The Choco Rainforest along Colombia’s Pacific Coast pulsates with life. Thousands of endemic species call this dense forest home, while expansive rivers empty out into the ocean through extensive deltas and mangrove forests. Afro-Colombian and Indigenous communities live side-by-side — or, more frequently, face-to-face — along the rivers of the Choco.

The isolated rivers and forests of the Choco have also been hotspots of conflict, illicit activity and state neglect, facilitated by their strategic access to the coast. Illegal gold mining in particular — along with drug, arms, timber and wildlife trafficking — has run the illegal economy and fueled conflict in the Choco for decades, making its Rivers of Blood the harsh, semi-literal inverse of the Indigenous interpretation of rivers as Mother Earth’s lifeblood

While artisanal mining for alluvial gold was — and remains — a relatively low-impact livelihood for the Choco’s many descendents of African slaves, semi-industrial mechanized mining has deforested, degraded and contaminated the rivers and riverine habitats of the Choco for the past 20-30 years. Both the open-pit mines and dredges along the rivers have used mercury in copious quantities, poisoning the drinking water and fish species. The ecological and health crisis is devastating Afro-Colombian and traditional Indigenous riverine communities. 

The Embera Dobidá — which literally means people of the river — live along the 416 mile, south-to-north flowing Atrato River and its tributaries, and have been actively protesting the exploitation of the Atrato and its surroundings for decades.

Embera Dobidá leader Belarmino Tunay told me in December 2019, “For us, the people of the river, the Atrato is everything. It is the origin, the provider of life and the extension of Karagabí [a holistic conception of a cosmic world and creator]…. The Atrato speaks to us, and it is suffering. The damage being done affects our health and threatens to destroy our culture.” Studies have shown dangerously high levels of mercury in the water, in fish species and in the people living along the banks of the Atrato, including members of the Embera Dobidá.

How Rights of Nature victories in Colombia’s Choco and Amazon rainforests can inform shared knowledge systems globally
Illegal gold mine in Colombia’s Choco Rainforest. Photo by D.H. Rasolt

South of the Atrato River Basin lives the Wounaan Indigenous ethnic group, principally concentrated along the San Juan River within the Choco. 

The San Juan has its source along the Andean slopes then flows west-southwest-west before draining 240 miles downstream into an impressive delta full of rich mangrove forests that depend on nutrient-rich sediments accumulated throughout the San Juan’s journey. Many fish species spawn within these mangrove forests, and just off the coast are breeding grounds for humpback whales, whose dances and songs inspire awe above and below the surface. It is a beautiful area at the confluence of different ecosystems, where Indigenous communities lived in harmony with this diverse ecological milieu for millennia.

The Wounaan — sometimes referred to as Embera Wounaan — are closely related to the Embera Dobidá (as well as other Embera such as the Chamí and Katío), in genealogy, linguistics and many traditions, though they subscribe to a number of distinct beliefs and practices specific to their biogeography. The Wounaan base their worldview around a “Supreme Father” known as Inwadam, who created all living beings in, along, and including the San Juan River, the less voluminous but ecologically unique Baudó River, and the limitless Pacific Ocean that they flow into. 

Respected Wounaan teacher and werregue artisan Yenny Cardenas spoke to me in her community of Union Balsalito on the northern bank of the lower San Juan River. “The river provides us with our livelihoods and our food, but more importantly it allows us to preserve what our ancestors have taught us about Inwadam and to practice our traditional crafts and medicine,” she said. “We live in constant fear though, knowing that someday soon we may be forced to leave our homes on the river permanently.” 

Tragically, the last few decades have brought strife and degradation to the idyllic river and riverine communities of the San Juan River Basin. And like the Atrato River, the San Juan River is believed to be contaminated with mercury from illegal gold mining upstream.

How Rights of Nature victories in Colombia’s Choco and Amazon rainforests can inform shared knowledge systems globally
“Weaving Tradition” – Vannessa Circe – Oil on Canvas – 24” x 30”

Within this complex socio-economic and environmental context, Colombia’s Constitutional Court gained international notoriety in 2017 for granting legal biocultural rights of “personhood” to the degraded Atrato River. Local “guardians” —  including members of Embera Dobidá and Afro-Colombian communities — are now responsible for being the legal voice of the river, in order to ensure its conservation, restoration and dynamic evolution.

Beyond symbolic legal victories

How can we turn this potentially revolutionary ecocentric framework of Rights of Nature from eloquent legalese, symbolic victories and often misunderstood traditional Indigenous worldviews, into pragmatic action in high-risk areas dominated by extensions of the modern world, such as rivers and riverine communities impacted by illegal gold mining and conflict?

To begin with, ways must be found to ensure the health and security of those individuals and local communities who speak in defense of rivers, forests, coral reefs, individual animal species and other designated legal persons within the Rights of Nature paradigm. Eliminating the existential threats to the Embera Dobidá and Wounaan, for example, is essential to protecting and restoring the diverse ecosystems of the Choco. 

To bolster formalized legal Rights of Nature in general and enforce accountability, culturally appropriate tools for monitoring, communicating and incontrovertibly documenting violations of nature’s rights are also needed. For off-grid communities, integrated solutions for connectivity and access to energy sources are also important, to coordinate monitoring efforts between themselves, and to share and receive vital information in real-time with the outside world.

Adaptable complex frameworks, such as the Multiple Evidence Base (MEB) approach and Mixed-method bicultural research, can help guide the formation and evolution of resilient, shared-knowledge initiatives around the world. “Using water as a central point of multidisciplinary, intercultural and educational collaboration, we can develop new ways of understanding our surroundings and place within them,” says professor Rafael Hurtado, a physicist from Colombia’s National University. Professor Hurtado leads REMONA, a community-based water quality monitoring network built around principles of complex systems science, that has recently been introduced to several isolated Indigenous communities in Colombia.

How Rights of Nature victories in Colombia’s Choco and Amazon rainforests can inform shared knowledge systems globally
A young Arhuaco man analyzes a sample of water from a sacred river within his territory in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta. Photo by V. Circe.

These kinds of multidisciplinary and intercultural shared knowledge approaches between integrated science and traditional knowledge can produce mutual understanding and evidence considered concrete within modern judicial structures; they may, in fact, form the foundational structure for upholding the rights of rivers and other dynamic ecosystems to “exist, thrive and evolve.”

Progress in Colombia since the Judgement of the Atrato River

The Judgement of the Atrato River set a strong precedent for Rights of Nature in Colombia, and along with some celebrated rulings granting personhood to sacred rivers in New Zealand and India, for further Rights of Nature advancements around the world. 

Between 2018-2020 there have been a number of local court rulings in Colombia, mostly at the municipal level, that have given nominal legal rights to some of Colombia’s rivers: the Cauca River, La Plata River and Pance River, for example. Rivers connect diverse ecosystems, and damage in one or multiple sections of a river can have cumulative impacts downstream, so — in reality — coordinated international, national or at least regional efforts are needed to effectively enforce Rights of Nature for rivers. 

The big post-Atrato victory for the Rights of Nature movement in Colombia, and potentially for our highly stressed living planet, was a 2018 ruling by the Colombian Supreme Court granting legal rights to the entire Colombian Amazon region. The proclamation builds off of the Judgement of the Atrato River, and is a rather beautifully crafted and comprehensive document. How Rights of Nature for the Colombian Amazon will formally and effectively be implemented remains to be seen, as deforestation, land grabbing and illegal gold mining have rapidly expanded throughout the entire Amazon region, including in several parts of the post-conflict Colombian Amazon. Illegal actors have also become further emboldened by the uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and rising global gold prices

An integrated, multidisciplinary and intercultural evidence-based system is needed to support the newly designated legal voices of Colombia’s rich ecosystems. A successful framework for enforcing Rights of Nature for the Choco and the Colombian Amazon could lay the groundwork for coordinated, interconnected efforts for the entire Amazon, and other bioculturally rich areas globally.

The post How Rights of Nature victories in Colombia’s rainforests can inform shared knowledge systems globally appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
https://www.shareable.net/how-rights-of-nature-victories-in-colombias-rainforests-can-inform-shared-knowledge-systems-globally/feed/ 0 40690
How the MyMizu app is creating community and fostering sustainability in Japan https://www.shareable.net/how-the-mymizu-app-is-creating-community-and-fostering-sustainability-in-japan/ https://www.shareable.net/how-the-mymizu-app-is-creating-community-and-fostering-sustainability-in-japan/#respond Thu, 21 Nov 2019 04:04:13 +0000 https://www.shareable.net/?p=38351 While Japan is committed to recycling and protecting the environment, with over five million vending machines and 50,000 convenience stores across the archipelago, buying bottled drinks while out and about is second nature to most people. A staggering 20 billion PET bottles are consumed each year in Japan. Moreover, in a culture where people don’t

The post How the MyMizu app is creating community and fostering sustainability in Japan appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
While Japan is committed to recycling and protecting the environment, with over five million vending machines and 50,000 convenience stores across the archipelago, buying bottled drinks while out and about is second nature to most people. A staggering 20 billion PET bottles are consumed each year in Japan. Moreover, in a culture where people don’t wish to be seen as expecting special treatment or getting something “extra,” the majority wouldn’t think to ask staff in a café or restaurant to refill their water bottle for them.

With the launch of this new app, however, things look set to change. (‘Mizu’ is the Japanese word for water). Using the MyMizu app, people can locate places to get free water refills — from public drinking fountains to restaurants and other participating businesses.

MyMizu is the brainchild of Robin Lewis and Mariko McTier, a pair of Tokyo-based millennials who share bicultural roots and a passion for social innovation. McTier was raised in the U.K. and has previously worked for a government program which facilitates innovation partnerships between Japan and the U.K. Lewis has lived and worked around the world, and has a background in humanitarian aid and international development. The duo joined forces to launch Social Innovation Japan, a platform for action on social and environmental issues, in 2017.

“At the heart of our work as Social Innovation Japan has been a mission to engage more people in social and environmental issues, ensuring that a growing community of people recognize the agency that they have to create change,” says McTier. “I’d been toying with the idea of leveraging technology and behavioral insights to encourage more sustainable consumer habits for many years. But although we were both aware of plastic waste as a global issue, neither of us had a clear vision of how we could tackle it.” 

During a visit to Kyushu in southern Japan in the spring of 2018, the sight of the sheer number of plastic bottles on the beach was the catalyst that inspired Lewis to come up with the initial idea of developing an app.

“It seemed totally crazy that we were paying so much money for something we didn’t really need — bottled water — and that this habit was having an enormous effect on our natural environment, and so we decided to try and stop the problem at the source,” Lewis points out.  “There are other services in other countries that have a similar offering, such as one called ‘Tap’ in the U.S., and ‘Refill’ in the U.K. However, MyMizu is the only free water refill app that we know of in Japan.”

Like many successful startups, MyMizu was developed with limited resources and a small band of dedicated personnel, but McTier says that things are moving in a positive direction, with a wide range of business partners and volunteers expressing interest in becoming involved since the launch of the app in September. 

Changing cultural mindsets is another issue the team has faced. “One of the challenges is that some people may not want to drink from public water fountains in parks, stations and so on,” Lewis says. “To tackle this, we are building a network of partner businesses — such as cafés, shops, restaurants and hotels — where you can refill your bottle for free so that users have an alternative to public water fountains, and encouraging users to upload photos of new refill spots they discover.”

Lewis adds that Japanese people often carry reusable drink bottles as children, but come to depend more on vending machines and convenience stores as they grow older. To this end, refilling bottles is not a completely new idea, but rather one with which people need to reacquaint themselves.

The businesses who have signed up with MyMizu see the value of what McTier and Lewis are trying to achieve, and are keen to contribute to Japan’s nascent but growing sustainability movement. Partner businesses are provided with MyMizu stickers for their windows, letting people know they have “permission” to come in and refill their bottles. 

“I think it comes down to community, and a sense of shared ownership. Sure, if you view refilling your water bottle as ‘taking’ water from a shop or business, then it is transactional and you may feel as though you need to give something in return. However, if you consider that both you and the business owner are part of a community, and it is in your shared interest to create an environment that is safe and sustainable to live in, then you are really just collaborating to create that desired environment using the resources and means available to you,” McTier explains.

Their timing seems to be perfect. Fueled by a sharp increase in inbound tourism in recent years, the number of foreign visitors to Japan quadrupled between 2012 and 2017. With Japan hosting the Rugby World Cup this year and the Tokyo Olympics coming in the summer of 2020, the nation is keen to show it is in touch with global trends — including working towards a more sustainable future. 

The MyMizu team have big plans going forward, including improving the app by adding  features such as games and a review function for refill spots. They are also working to educate and engage with the public through talks and workshops at schools, universities and companies, and are even exploring the idea of forming official partnerships with local governments to make their areas more “refill-friendly.”

“MyMizu is not just an app; it’s a movement. Education and in-person engagement are critical components of what we are trying to accomplish, which is not just to reduce plastic consumption but a larger shift in consciousness around sustainability,” Lewis says.

##

This post is part of our Winter 2019 editorial series on waste reduction. Get our free ebook on this series: “Beyond Waste: Community Solutions to Managing Our Resources.” Shareable is a partner of this project with Greenpeace. 

Take a look at the other articles in the series:

The post How the MyMizu app is creating community and fostering sustainability in Japan appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
https://www.shareable.net/how-the-mymizu-app-is-creating-community-and-fostering-sustainability-in-japan/feed/ 0 38351
River protection: A cross-border effort to tackle climate change https://www.shareable.net/river-protection-a-cross-border-effort-to-tackle-climate-change/ https://www.shareable.net/river-protection-a-cross-border-effort-to-tackle-climate-change/#respond Mon, 23 Sep 2019 15:48:27 +0000 https://www.shareable.net/?p=37869 A campaign to turn the watershed of five European rivers into the first UNESCO biosphere reserve is expected to create an important floodplain buffer for central Europe. The Mura, Drava and Danube are three connected rivers which together stretch 434 miles across central and southeast Europe. They are free-flowing rivers for much of their journey,

The post River protection: A cross-border effort to tackle climate change appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
A campaign to turn the watershed of five European rivers into the first UNESCO biosphere reserve is expected to create an important floodplain buffer for central Europe. The Mura, Drava and Danube are three connected rivers which together stretch 434 miles across central and southeast Europe. They are free-flowing rivers for much of their journey, and support 1 million hectares of what conservation organizations call highly valuable natural and cultural landscapes. Many endangered species such as the little tern, black stork, beaver, otter and the nearly extinct ship sturgeon, find their home here. Migratory waterfowl are hard to miss, since every year more than 250,000 of them use the rivers to rest and feed. Since most rivers in Europe have been altered and their ecological value lowered, a watershed this size is unique in the world.

In a new model of environmental cooperation, five countries — Austria, Croatia, Hungary, Slovenia and Serbia — are working towards the creation of the largest transboundary natural reserve in Europe and the first five-country UNESCO biosphere reserve in the world. It would unite 12 major riverine areas that are already protected.

With protection of the Amazon rainforest making headlines in the context of fighting climate change, proponents say this watershed is also an important battleground for climate protection, as the “Amazon of Europe.”

The development of this new model of transboundary management was initiated in 2000 by regional offices of the World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF). 

“In the current era of climate crisis and species extinction, it is absolutely not a luxury pastime but a matter of humankind’s survival to protect our last natural areas,” said initiative leader Arno Mohl from WWF Austria. He said the area had the Danube basin’s largest floodplain forests. “The planned biosphere reserve is of key importance as it aims to protect and restore our Amazon, an important step away from nature exploitation and towards sustainable living together with nature,” he said.

“The main reason why we lead this initiative is the necessity for a joint and harmonized management of this remarkable river corridor. Water bodies in this area are still mostly managed with solutions that are not in a correlation with nature. Some of the biggest issues are threats of potential new dams, extraction of sand and gravel, channelization of rivers. Due to an astonishing biodiversity of this landscape and support which this ecosystem provides to people, WWF decided to act and support [the] governments of [the] five countries towards its protection“, explains Ivana Korn Varga from WWF’s office in Croatia.

The goal is for the biosphere reserve Mura-Drava-Danube, to be protected by UNESCO’s Man and Biosphere program. The culmination of seven years’ work, the reserve is close to becoming a reality. In 2012, UNESCO approved the joint nomination of the Croatian and Hungarian protected areas, which was followed by the approval of the Serbian rivers in 2017, Slovenia in 2018 and Austria this year. The next step is for all the countries to receive joint approval from UNESCO, which will give the reserve global recognition.

It has not been easy. Four out of five countries involved are members of the European Union but there are still many differences in laws and regulations and in the management of protected areas. 

“The goal behind the biosphere reserve is to have harmonized management and at the end to protect those beautiful rivers. Nature has no boundaries, humans are the ones who are creating differences and from our perspective the unique ecosystem should be managed in a unique way,”  points out Korn Varga.

Since the reserve covers a very large area, public engagement was complex. Some people use the river for activities like fishing or tourism. As the reserve project takes shape, new sustainable activities have emerged, including transboundary routes for cycling tourism which tie in with farmers markets.

“Of course, our aim is also to provide local people possibility to benefit from the nature they are surrounded with. We see the five-country reserve that we will soon have as an amazing opportunity to harmonize river management in order to amplify the benefits for local communities while providing the rivers with an opportunity to restore to its natural state and support people, but also animal and plant life,” says Korn Varga. 

The post River protection: A cross-border effort to tackle climate change appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
https://www.shareable.net/river-protection-a-cross-border-effort-to-tackle-climate-change/feed/ 0 37869
Green Infrastructure is (de)paving a pathway to resilience https://www.shareable.net/green-infrastructure-is-depaving-a-pathway-to-resilience/ https://www.shareable.net/green-infrastructure-is-depaving-a-pathway-to-resilience/#respond Tue, 02 Jul 2019 19:02:11 +0000 https://www.shareable.net/?p=32255 America is becoming increasingly and dangerously waterlogged. And it’s not just rural areas. Cities are especially vulnerable to a phenomenon called urban flooding because they are less permeable than their rural counterparts due to concrete surfaces and inadequate infrastructure. Runoff overflow can turn streets into rivers. According to the Natural Resources Defense Council, by the

The post Green Infrastructure is (de)paving a pathway to resilience appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
America is becoming increasingly and dangerously waterlogged. And it’s not just rural areas. Cities are especially vulnerable to a phenomenon called urban flooding because they are less permeable than their rural counterparts due to concrete surfaces and inadequate infrastructure. Runoff overflow can turn streets into rivers. According to the Natural Resources Defense Council, by the end of the century, floodplains could increase by as much as 45 percent, with climate change causing heavier rains and more storms. Fixing deteriorated pipes and building more infrastructure will help cities, but it’s expensive and disruptive. Fortunately, cities have another solution that’s cheaper, more sustainable, and can lift up communities and provide jobs: a back-to-nature approach called “green infrastructure.”

Green infrastructure is, at its core, about utilizing nature to manage storm-water. Pavement is impermeable, but vegetation and soil have an innate ability to manage water before it ever reaches a city’s sewers. Through strategically planted trees, parks, and wetlands, cities can reduce strain on their sewer systems, and reduce pollution at the same time. The Democracy Collaborative recently released a report recommending the use of green infrastructure as a community-based climate adaptation strategy.

Johanna Bozuwa, who authored the report, said in an interview: “We’re seeing the power of nature, every day. Some of our man-made solutions can’t stand up to what is happening around us… nature knows how to deal with these things better than we do, and it’s been around so much longer. The biomimicry community has found that we can use what is already here for our benefit and it will have positive ramifications.”

Green infrastructure is an appealing policy solution because it has benefits far beyond storm-water management — research has long shown that increasing vegetation and green space increases quality of life in a community. “The exciting thing about green infrastructure is obviously this storm-water management piece,” said Bozuwa. “But if we are literally ripping up concrete and putting in trees, or shrubs, or even parks, that is going to have a multiplicity of benefits.”

Besides the positive impact on people’s health, green infrastructure also has the capacity to lift up communities economically through well-paying, quality local jobs. “So much of the infrastructure [for water] has been disinvested in the United States and as there’s a mounting issue of climate change, storm-water infrastructure is becoming more and more apparent as a necessary intervention in order for us to have climate resilient cities,” said Bozuwa. “We zeroed in on green infrastructure because we saw some of this potential for job creation and providing jobs to underserved and marginalized communities.”

Because green infrastructure is a distributed solution that requires longer-term maintenance but lower upfront costs, it is ideal for worker cooperatives (democratically owned and operated businesses) and social enterprises (nonprofits that have a fee-for-service component) in low-income communities where jobs are needed. Green infrastructure workers can be trained on the job and the work can offer upward mobility while increasing climate resilience. However, to work as a community resiliency model, Bozuwa emphasized that green infrastructure initiatives will have to be carefully designed to avoid displacement and gentrification: working deeply with the community, coordinating with existing unions, and led by residents.

In her report, Bozuwa mentions several case studies of effective green infrastructure initiatives, one of which is the nonprofit group Verde’s landscaping project in the majority-Latinx Cully neighborhood of Portland, Oregon. Verde Landscape is a social enterprise landscaping firm with a four-year training program that can lead to long-term employment or prepare participants to start their own businesses. One of the things that struck Bozuwa about the Verde project is that it was started by an existing community group that works on affordable housing, Hacienda CDC, which is based in the neighborhood.

“One really interesting piece [in my fieldwork] was the persistence with which this activists and community organizers are thinking about the displacement potential of green infrastructure if we don’t design our housing and think of these things as systems,” said Bozuwa. “And that is a reason why the Verde model is so compelling.”

Bozuwa and the Democracy Collaborative were attracted to green infrastructure as a route to long-term, community-led climate resilience. She is hopeful that green infrastructure will continue to be put in place in cities around the United States. Green infrastructure projects are already around the country in cities like Seattle, Washington DC, Oakland, California, Buffalo, New York, and others.

Some U.S. cities are already under consent decrees, agreements with the Environmental Protection Agency to reduce storm-water runoff and sewer overflow. Green infrastructure could be part of that commitment. Green infrastructure can work very effectively alongside traditional gray infrastructure, such as structures made of concrete, and act as a community development tool at the same time. Climate resiliency will require both large-scale infrastructure projects and smaller ones, but greening America’s cities from the ground up is a climate solution worth getting behind.

##

This article is part of our series on disaster collectivism. Download our free series ebook here.

The post Green Infrastructure is (de)paving a pathway to resilience appeared first on Shareable.

]]>
https://www.shareable.net/green-infrastructure-is-depaving-a-pathway-to-resilience/feed/ 0 32255